Rising Maintenance Costs
Reactive repairs, delayed response, poorly structured vendor contracts, and untracked R&M spend quietly erode margins — often undetected until they surface as EBITDA misses.
MCK Horizons bridges the gap between complex technical requirements and bottom-line business objectives. With 30+ years leading multi-state petroleum fueling portfolios, we treat operations and facilities as strategic assets — not cost centers.
Petroleum operators face four compounding pressures that quietly compress margins — often undetected until the numbers slip.
Reactive repairs, delayed response, poorly structured vendor contracts, and untracked R&M spend quietly erode margins — often undetected until they surface as EBITDA misses.
Escalating CUPA, EHS, and Air Quality requirements demand greater resource allocation to sustain compliance and minimize corrective-action risk across jurisdictions.
Owners and contractors operate without standardized KPIs, utilization metrics, or accountability frameworks — leaving performance ungoverned and profitability exposed.
Uncontrolled capital spend, unplanned scope deferrals, and budget overruns that compress margins and erode projected ROI on fueling infrastructure.
MCK Horizons bridges this gap — bringing strategic oversight, operational integrity, and a proven track record of margin improvement.
Six disciplines that turn facilities and operations into a durable source of margin — deployed as fractional leadership, defined-scope projects, or ongoing advisory.
Fractional VP-level leadership across the full UST system lifecycle — from large-scale construction and tank replacements to service programs and compliance — on time, on budget, and audit-ready.
Uncover margin leaks in labor utilization, vendor spend, and job costing — consistently delivering 15–25% increases in technician productivity through disciplined operational controls.
Build and lead audit-ready programs across CUPA, EHS, and Air Quality — centralizing risk tracking, compliance calendars, and mitigation into one governance system that protects operating licenses.
Drive vendor performance through disciplined contractor evaluation, contract negotiation, and scorecard accountability — reducing service costs while protecting compliance and uptime.
Build operational-intelligence systems that give ownership clear, real-time visibility into cost structures, performance KPIs, and regulatory risk — eliminating the blind spots that erode margins.
Serve as senior program authority for fueling infrastructure portfolios — aligning capital investment, construction execution, and equipment rollouts to deliver modernized, compliant facilities.
By converting a reactive maintenance culture into a disciplined, planned-maintenance operating system — with vendor accountability, KPI governance, and contract restructuring — the program delivered roughly $4.7M in annualized savings against a $26M baseline, over 18 months, without sacrificing uptime or compliance.
Read the full case study Discuss your portfolio| Metric | Baseline | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| R&M annual spend | $26.0M | $21.3M | −18% |
| Reactive work orders | 72% | 28% | +44 pts |
| Vendor invoice accuracy | 81% | 97% | +16 pts |
| Avg. days to repair | 4.8 | 2.1 | −56% |
| Compliance audit pass | 88% | 100% | +12 pts |
| Technician utilization | 64% | 81% | +17 pts |
UST construction, dispenser service, tank-monitoring repair, carwash, and compliance-testing contractors operating without standardized KPIs, utilization tracking, or workforce accountability — leaving margin on the table and struggling to scale profitably.
Independent and regional chain operators managing 5–500+ locations who need facilities VP-level leadership and compliance oversight without the cost and commitment of a full-time executive hire.
Branded fuel marketers and wholesale distributors managing dealer or company-operated networks who need disciplined compliance program management, vendor governance, and capital project oversight across diverse jurisdictions.
Private-equity-owned fueling and convenience portfolios requiring accelerated EBITDA improvement, operational standardization, and audit-ready compliance positioning ahead of exit or recapitalization events.
Ken Green has spent three decades leading multi-state petroleum portfolios — governing R&M and capital programs, standing up compliance governance across five states, and conducting facilities due diligence on 250+ acquisition targets. He brings that executive discipline directly to owner-operators, contractors, and PE-backed platforms.
Directed multi-state EHS operations and regulatory compliance across California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, and Missouri — providing executive oversight across:
“I bridge the gap between complex technical requirements and bottom-line business objectives. By treating operations and facilities as strategic assets rather than cost centers, I help owners and operators achieve peak efficiency and long-term profitability.”
Deeper reading for operators and investors — a documented case study, the governance frameworks behind the results, and a technical reference from the field.
How a reactive-to-planned maintenance conversion delivered $4.7M in annual savings.
Read the case study → White PaperWhy operators leave 15–25% EBITDA on the table — and a 10-question self-assessment to find yours.
Read the white paper → FrameworkThe CUPA, EHS, Air Quality & UST governance system behind 100% audit adherence.
View the framework → Reference GuideA technical reference on systems, compliance testing, revenue profile, and margin levers.
Open the guide →Tell me a little about your portfolio and where margins feel exposed. I'll identify where MCK Horizons can drive measurable EBITDA impact — a straight read, no pitch.